> Am I missing something that indicates it was a larger CNN issue above and beyond a single rogue contributor? No, you aren't missing anything. No one says tha

> Am I missing something that indicates it was a larger CNN issue above and beyond a single rogue contributor? No, you aren't missing anything. No one says that CNN as a whole committed a grand conspiracy to assist Hillary with questions. However, each one of those "rogue CNN contributors" reflects poorly on the company as a whole, and the image of the whole media outlet as trustworthy suffers.