3 ms·
I disagree that any vote on the matter of how much power the executive should have, or if any specific executive should be punished for an abuse of that power,
by TallGuyShort 7y ago
I disagree that any vote on the matter of how much power the executive should have, or if any specific executive should be punished for an abuse of that power, would fall along anything other than party lines, with those in the same party as the current executive voting in his or her favor.
- shadowgovt 7y agoAh, okay. So at least one of the two parties is corrupt.
- TallGuyShort 7y agoYes, and I think both. The Republicans aren't the only ones that put party above principal in votes. I mean ask a Democratic official why they oppose the electoral college, and then ask if they would support getting rid of superdelegates in the primary. And look at the reactions to Tulsi Gabbard's "present" vote in the impeachment. Absolute furor that she broke party lines and subsequent exclusion from debates.
- shadowgovt 7y agoAre you aware of anybody asking them, or is that a hypothetical?
- TallGuyShort 7y agoI'm sick of waiting for the reply button to show up and I'm heading out for the day. But it's not hypothetical. My state voted to give our electoral college votes to the popular vote a few years back. I emailed all the state representatives and got canned emails back along party lines, some explaining how anything but direct democracy causes people's voices to not be heard. I asked the Democrats if they would support a proposal to eliminate superdelegates in the primaries, and I didn't get any responses. I've asked two directly at various events, one told me "I'm not concerned about that particular issue" and the other one told me that they've already made the opinion on that clear (I never found where and was asked by an usher to move back for other questions). Don't know how or if they voted when the party eventually did change that, but I have little hope that asking them questions in the future would mean anything.