I genuinely don’t think it is flame bait. It is a discussion worth having. Are we really bringing any benefit to society by regulating this when the benefits ar

I genuinely don’t think it is flame bait. It is a discussion worth having. Are we really bringing any benefit to society by regulating this when the benefits are so potent, and the cost is demonstrably one we don’t care about in the first place? And if we do consider this an issue, is this worth regulating given what it will cost us? Should we not wait for the bigger issue to be regulated first before depriving us of this advantage? That is the point I was trying to get at. A criticism of the hypocrisy of this whole regulation debate. Sorry if it came off as flames.