3 ms·
...and yet, it was the center of big, old liberal media that broke the Weinstein story, not some investigative citizen-youtuber. And a large part of Ronan's st
by IfOnlyYouKnew 7y ago
...and yet, it was the center of big, old liberal media that broke the Weinstein story, not some investigative citizen-youtuber.
And a large part of Ronan's story was to try how this worked. It wasn't that the people who knew (to varying degree) did not want to out him. They just feared for their livelihood, and sometimes more.
- proximitysauce 7y agoEven with Farrow's access and background he barely got the story out. > And a large part of Ronan's story was to try how this worked. It wasn't that the people who knew (to varying degree) did not want to out him. They just feared for their livelihood, and sometimes more. Correct, but my statement was about media trustworthiness. It doesn't really matter if people are keeping quite because they want to or because there's some super powerful individual that's coercing them to keep quiet, the result for the audience is the same. Why believe outlets that are covering up for the most heinous corruption and crimes imaginable? The media has a well earned reputation problem. Also, I'm not sure why you want to make this a partisan argument. It's not, there's plenty of corruption to go around. I deliberately chose non-political examples of corruption.
- mc32 7y agoAt that point when they joined the chorus it was undeniable. That had to. In the meantime for over ten years they kept things quiet.