3 ms·
Sure: * Harvey Weinstein was covered up by many in the media as detailed in Ronan Farrow's Pulitzer Prize winning piece in The New Yorker [1] * ABC killed a s
by proximitysauce 7y ago
Sure:
* Harvey Weinstein was covered up by many in the media as detailed in Ronan Farrow's Pulitzer Prize winning piece in The New Yorker [1]
* ABC killed a story about Jeffery Epstein in 2015 in part to retain access to the royal family. Epstein continued to sex traffic children for 3 years after this report would have aired [2]
* The BBC covered up for Jimmy Savile's pedophila (and other horrors I won't reprint here) for decades. The head of the BBC during that time left right before the scandal came to light to become the current CEO of The New York Times [3]
There are many other examples but these are recent and well documented.
1. https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/from-aggressive-overtures-to-sexual-assault-harvey-weinsteins-accusers-tell-their-stories https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/from-aggressive-ove...
2. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/abc-news-amy-robach-jeffrey-epstein-reporting-killed_n_5dc1c3b7e4b0b0861f8f85e9 https://www.huffpost.com/entry/abc-news-amy-robach-jeffrey-e...
3. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/oct/30/jimmy-savile-mark-thompson-new-york-times https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/oct/30/jimmy-...
- IfOnlyYouKnew 7y ago...and yet, it was the center of big, old liberal media that broke the Weinstein story, not some investigative citizen-youtuber. And a large part of Ronan's story was to try how this worked. It wasn't that the people who knew (to varying degree) did not want to out him. They just feared for their livelihood, and sometimes more.
- proximitysauce 7y agoEven with Farrow's access and background he barely got the story out. > And a large part of Ronan's story was to try how this worked. It wasn't that the people who knew (to varying degree) did not want to out him. They just feared for their livelihood, and sometimes more. Correct, but my statement was about media trustworthiness. It doesn't really matter if people are keeping quite because they want to or because there's some super powerful individual that's coercing them to keep quiet, the result for the audience is the same. Why believe outlets that are covering up for the most heinous corruption and crimes imaginable? The media has a well earned reputation problem. Also, I'm not sure why you want to make this a partisan argument. It's not, there's plenty of corruption to go around. I deliberately chose non-political examples of corruption.
- mc32 7y agoAt that point when they joined the chorus it was undeniable. That had to. In the meantime for over ten years they kept things quiet.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]