3 ms·

I mean... he’s also not a U.S. citizen, and wasn’t / isn’t under the jurisdiction of the U.S... so sure if they argue he has no first amendment rights, then ho

I mean... he’s also not a U.S. citizen, and wasn’t / isn’t under the jurisdiction of the U.S... so sure if they argue he has no first amendment rights, then how do they argue they have jurisdiction?

creaghpatr 7y ago
Because it concerns US property (classified intelligence)
agotterer 7y ago
Isn’t this a slippery slope? Could the argument be made that anyone who isn’t a U.S. citizen isn’t protected by the constitution then? Not a citizen, you can’t say what you want when you want. Not a citizen you don’t get the right to due process. Etc.
- non-entity 7y ago
  The US just assassinated a high ranking military official of a nation we arent at war with openly without even attempting it covertly. It would seem that they are already well invested in carrying out justice against foreign nationals as they see fit