Those pictures are fake. Not sure how, but other than brain damage two brains wouldn't look different like that. We don't have the tech for registering the dif

Those pictures are fake. Not sure how, but other than brain damage two brains wouldn't look different like that. We don't have the tech for registering the difference in smarts even if it existed between reading and screen time. I know the pictures are a mix of the children, but don't understand how? It feels like the researchers have picked a technique that will give two different pictures, no matter what given a mix of kids aka a pretty picture for the media. I'm sure in the journal article they have not lied. But I can't understand after reading it what the pictures are. Clever.