> Am I wrong? They didn’t just measure being able to read. They also focused on verbal ability using the EVT-2 and CTOPP-2 Rapid Object Naming tests. From what

> Am I wrong? They didn’t just measure being able to read. They also focused on verbal ability using the EVT-2 and CTOPP-2 Rapid Object Naming tests. From what I can find, neither of those tests involve reading. According to its documentation, “The EVT–2 measures expressive vocabulary and word retrieval of the spoken word in standard American English and thus assesses vocabulary acquisition.” The details of the CTOPP-2 Rapid Object Naming test are harder to find, but it is a part of the test that is considered to not rely on reading. From the docs “ Rapid Non-Symbolic Naming Composite Score (RNNCS) comprises the standard scores of two subtests-Rapid Color Naming and Rapid Object Naming and offers an alternative for young children, ages 4 through 6 year olds, not familiar with letters and numbers. The RNNCS measures the examinee's ability to include efficient retrieval of phonological information from long-term or permanent memory and executing a sequence of operations quickly and repeatedly using objects and colors.“ [0] https://images.pearsonclinical.com/images/Products/EVT-II/evt2.pdf https://images.pearsonclinical.com/images/Products/EVT-II/ev... [1] https://www.proedinc.com/Products/13080/ctopp2-comprehensive-test-of-phonological-processingsecond-edition.aspx https://www.proedinc.com/Products/13080/ctopp2-comprehensive...