> Considering the value of their service, GA on their marketing page seems like a very small compromise. It's not a compromise until you consider the value of

> Considering the value of their service, GA on their marketing page seems like a very small compromise. It's not a compromise until you consider the value of both sides of the equation. Please do elaborate on that, with some details on the negative externalities of blindly sharing your tracking data with Google. Otherwise your argument just became "superior data has got some value to me, which is more than none, so yeah I got mine". It's not less of an all-or-nothing attitude if you fail to seriously consider the other side of the supposed compromise.