3 ms·

I think that [1] is the paper that this is based on. I don't work on dynamics and I found it pretty readable. Most of what is in the article is in sections 3.2,

I think that [1] is the paper that this is based on. I don't work on dynamics and I found it pretty readable. Most of what is in the article is in sections 3.2, section 4 (discussion) and section 5 (conclusions). [1] https://arxiv.org/pdf/1904.11436.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/1904.11436.pdf

acqq 7y ago
> I think that [1] is the paper Sure it is, it is linked in this sentence of the article: “Now, though, new observations have thrown a monkey in the wrench with all this. Those galaxies aren't the exception. They're the rule.” The other relevant link is: https://ras.ac.uk/news-and-press/research-highlights/citizen-scientists-re-tune-hubbles-galaxy-classification https://ras.ac.uk/news-and-press/research-highlights/citizen...