3 ms·
It's not an example of sunk cost fallacy, much less a "perfect" one. If you insist on shoehorning it, then the fallacy argues against you since the future valu
by jimmyvalmer 7y ago
It's not an example of sunk cost fallacy, much less a "perfect" one. If you
insist on shoehorning it, then the fallacy argues against you since the future
value of emacs is no longer diminished by the sunk cost of configuring it.