All PRs should have a standard format it helps both the reviewers and the author. One thing that works well is to use prefilled template with 3/4 main sections

All PRs should have a standard format it helps both the reviewers and the author. One thing that works well is to use prefilled template with 3/4 main sections. Something like: ### What 'Describe your change' ### Why `Describe what drove this change (bugfix, feature, crash,...)` ### Links 'Link to ticket or design` ### Testing `What should reviewers look for`