Prudent approach, gives time to define more finely how, when and what it is used for etc. After all, seems a fair few laws are a loophole away from enabling mo

Prudent approach, gives time to define more finely how, when and what it is used for etc. After all, seems a fair few laws are a loophole away from enabling more crime than the law prevents. So a step back like this, does so in balance towards the consumer/people over government/business. But like many things, there will always be exceptions and those that will take exception to them, which is fair as that is how democracy works - equal voice and often it has taught us that whilst today their may be a small child at the back questioning things, there may be more tomorrow and the next day. Showing that all questions need answers, this is a good start in enabling that. Will the public engage and have their say heard, or will the EU pull for pubic say and what balance will play out. We will know over the years and be great to see how far that goes 5 years from now, once the ban has ended, or been extended.