2 ms·
> she was not particularly bothered that Krauss had touched her breast without permission. That does not make the behavior appropriate. > It's for Krauss's em
by ramblerman 7y ago
> she was not particularly bothered that Krauss had touched her breast without permission. That does not make the behavior appropriate.
> It's for Krauss's employer to decide whether that's a firing offense, not her.
Yeah, I think you've made your standpoint abundantly clear.
2 adults had an interaction, both are fine with it, then and now, but being a woman she is clearly not capable of deciding for herself if this was offensive, so you are happy to feel violated on her behalf.
- foldr 7y ago>both are fine with it, She said very clearly that she was not fine with it: https://youtu.be/wr9OIty2XGg?t=339 https://youtu.be/wr9OIty2XGg?t=339 https://youtu.be/wr9OIty2XGg?t=379 https://youtu.be/wr9OIty2XGg?t=379 My feelings don't come into it. My point is that a university is perfectly justified in firing a professor who touches women sexually without their permission. You yourself care so much about this woman's point of view that you either haven't bothered to watch the video, or have decided to wilfully misrepresent its contents.