2 ms·
My answer to that question will come across snarky or "the medical profession appealing to authority," I'm afraid, because I'd like to see your remarks entirely
by mdthrowaway 7y ago
My answer to that question will come across snarky or "the medical profession appealing to authority," I'm afraid, because I'd like to see your remarks entirely removed as medically harmful. Your purpose is clear from your other, more to the point remark: if only it had been for a random HN commenter who's never been to medical school speculating about two entirely unrelated diseases based on the presence of a common hormone, you might have avoided the diagnostic history and pain in your family that you report. That's a ridiculous position, both interpersonally as well as scientifically, but I know that engaging on it with you will look like I'm trying to steer people to my field rather than encouraging independent research of our discipline.
I'm here because I'm learning to write software, but I wouldn't pretend to understand the paper or mathematic theory behind, say, Paxos because I recognize some terms in it. I know my limitations, and all I ask is that you consider them, as well. The problem with raising awareness as you are is that it's difficult to objectively remove yourself: Segawa's is _incredibly_ rare, making all of the events in your family difficult to explain. Scientifically, transferring your experiences to others is a very tall order without much further study (and I hope you, and your family, are being studied, specifically because the genetics of Segawa's are poorly understood). What people portray as medical professionals swinging the hammer on "the information that could make us irrelevant" is actually trying to stand fast to the exact same scientific discipline that you, and every member of this audience, does in _every single other context_.
Your speculation about the relationship between ADHD and Segawa's is so far off base that a second-year medical student could probably explain why; you just happen to have been diagnosed with both. Left unspoken: it is quite possible to have both, because they present and manifest in different ways.
- omgwtfbyobbq 7y agoI'm happy to modify the portions of my post you think are medically harmful. I could be wrong, and I've been wrong before. But at the same time you could be wrong, and I think you are relying a bit much on appeals to authority. Just my opinion of course. I also wouldn't sell yourself short about making contributions to other fields. If you're wrong, you're wrong, but let someone else tell you that. I had to dig around and look real hard to even begin to figure out what was going on with my grandmother and ultimately my family. I was wrong a few times along the way, but we were able to figure it out. My guess is that DRD is under diagnosed because of reduced or low penetrance in some cases. As far as I can tell, for the majority of our lives, no single person in my immediate family would fit the diagnoses, but as a family, we apparently do, especially if someone knows where to look and what to look for. I suspect my extended family on my grandma's side has it as well, but I doubt any family with it would be diagnosed unless they happened to have someone who presented with it in an obvious way. The urgency you're detecting in my posts is because in my experience, 10+ doctors and 4 neurologists missed it and/or mistook it for other diseases. It was especially hazardous for my grandmother because they were insisting on doing the medical version of taking her out back and shooting her even though their treatment of her in medical and custodial care settings was causing the very symptoms they claimed were due to other disorders. And yes, I do not want someone else to go through that, especially since having other relatives who also respond to carbo/levo seems to be critical in helping establish a diagnosis when there isn't someone in the family who presents in a typical way. If you want, I can modify my post, but like I said before, I strongly suspect the presentation of ADHD with other characteristics, which are admittedly not symptoms of either disorder, increases the odds that someone has DRD or some other neurological disorder that's also contributing to the presentation of their ADHD. If you have some compelling evidence that there is no interaction between DRD or similar and ADHD, I'm happy to see it, but from personal experience that is not the case.