3 ms·
Is it? This seems like something distinctly modern, and enabled first by the mass media and now by hyperpresent images and video on our phones. Modern = past 1
by graeme 7y ago
Is it? This seems like something distinctly modern, and enabled first by the mass media and now by hyperpresent images and video on our phones.
Modern = past 1800 or so, with newspapers and the printing press and widespread literacy.
I’m trying to think of past examples and religious ones are the main ones I can come up with.
To be clear, I’m taking you to refer to an abstract violent status quo, where the violence is present but not tangible. (Unlike past status quos where you might readily see brute physical force directly rather than in video)
- AstralStorm 7y agoIt's just visibility. People have empathized with unfortunates (called as such and not blamed for their problems) locally a long time ago too, some were unhappy there are a lot of poor and other wretches. It is what has driven some of the accomplishments we take for granted nowadays. The relative lack of visibility of people with those problems is rather increasing the lack of empathy. What you do not know you cannot empathize with properly.