It seems about as charitable as a profit driven corporation, which was being evaluated. On a less snarky note: We've been repeatedly shown that companies act i

It seems about as charitable as a profit driven corporation, which was being evaluated. On a less snarky note: We've been repeatedly shown that companies act in their own self interest, and put out as cover reasons that are more socially acceptable. But also, I think "restricting consumer choice because their warranty wouldn't cover it" is a terrible reason, and shouldn't be socially acceptable.