3 ms·
From what I understand, it's possible he did violate the law when they systematically denied and ignored all the science related to it. There are already multip
by chewbacha 7y ago
From what I understand, it's possible he did violate the law when they systematically denied and ignored all the science related to it. There are already multiple lawsuits alleging this. My understanding is that the EPA's mandate requires scientific input in the rational decision making.
I think it's _ok_ for congress to grant some power to set rules, so long as there is appropriate checks and balances. However, we have seen in the past few days that the GOP does not want to enforce the checks and balances anymore.
- CWuestefeld 7y agowe have seen in the past few days that the GOP does not want to enforce the checks and balances anymore. There's more than enough blame to completely cover both sides of the aisle, on any number of issues.
- sp332 7y agoHolding Democrats accountable doesn't mean pretending both sides are equally bad.
- CWuestefeld 7y agoThey're both so bad that I don't see any point in drawing a distinction. For practical purposes, yes, they're equally bad.