5 ms·
In that case wouldn't it be a better solution to aggressively remove those who harass others about personal things rather than the topic at hand instead of maki
by somehnguy 7y ago
In that case wouldn't it be a better solution to aggressively remove those who harass others about personal things rather than the topic at hand instead of making a site where women specifically are treated as a special/protected class?
- root_axis 7y agoWell, I imagine the site was created in-part to afford the creators the freedom to moderate with respect to those goals, there's not really much they can do about the moderation strategies of sites they do not control. Regardless of an individual or community, people are often told "if you don't like it, go create your own community" and so this is what they did. At the end of the day, it's a win-win for everyone; those who may not appreciate a gender-sensitive moderation strategy will get to stay in the communities they enjoy, while those seeking a different approach now have an additional option.
- 9BillionMistake 7y agoThat would not give women a leg up though. You are right, but the reason they don't do that is because is does not advantage them. A closed group that helps its members is the best way to accomplish this. It is why it is looked down on when men do it.