Voter intimidation at a local or institutional level is absolutely massive but giving people the _choice_ of voting in various ways hopefully negates the bad. I

Voter intimidation at a local or institutional level is absolutely massive but giving people the _choice_ of voting in various ways hopefully negates the bad. I'd love to understand the data and anecdotal stories on this as well if any is available. I suspect that those in such abusive situations don't even get to vote whatsoever because they're physically captive / bound, but that is 100% conjecture on my part. Nobody advocating for this voting technology wants to encourage any form of intimidation and distortion of individuals' wills like you've described.