> > Chrome is not part of the OS. > Legally irrelevant. If that was relevant, Microsoft wouldn't be attacked for bundling IE. I would argue that this shows th

> > Chrome is not part of the OS. > Legally irrelevant. If that was relevant, Microsoft wouldn't be attacked for bundling IE. I would argue that this shows that it is legally relevant. Because it is possible to say that IE is not part of the OS but an application, we can talk about “bundling” products together at all. If IE and Windows were one indecomposable unit, I don’t think the EU would have had a case.