When there's this `donate.mozilla.org` website, then, no I don't think the execs should have market rates. Either remove the donation website, or find execs wh

When there's this `donate.mozilla.org` website, then, no I don't think the execs should have market rates. Either remove the donation website, or find execs who are driven not by money and market rates, but by changing and improving society. I think the latter types of execs, would work better, for making FF popular and increasing revenue. The idea that only execs that need lots of money (market rate) or they'd jump to another company, can do a good job, seems weird to me. I've understood that in theory the Donate-to-Mozilla thing doesn't donate to the execs — but in practice, I'd say yes it does (to some extent at least). > which would likely lead to more than 70 employees losing their jobs? I think (guess) the opposite. That they could all have kept their job and Mozilla could have hired more.