3 ms·
I had an ESA certificate for a while and may get one again soon. I never lied to get one, either. That said, the online certification basically amounts to a lon
by lxmorj 7y ago
I had an ESA certificate for a while and may get one again soon. I never lied to get one, either. That said, the online certification basically amounts to a long-form version of needing to answer yes to two questions:
1 - does flying stress you out?
2 - does your dog make you feel better?
I never once used it for anything but flying, because things like bringing your dog to the groceries or the movies or a restaurant is just unnecessary. If you find yourself splitting your time between two cities that are >1 day drive apart, you have only a few choices:
1 - Don't have a dog over 18lbs
2 - Leave dog half the time
3 - Risk dog's life and guarantee a Very Bad Time under the plane
4 - Get ESA certificate
I think airlines are leaving money on the table and should just have a relatively expensive travel-certification obedience course and charge a boatload for it. I'd happily pay $500 per year to have my dog authorized to fly in the cabin without an ESA (which incidentally cost less than half that).
To pre-address the typical objections (and to steal from my own HN comment almost 3 years ago):
"People are allergic!" For $100 a tiny shedding dog can ride in a very-not-dander-proof container. My dog is non-shedding.
"They can be noisy!" So can your toddler. So can above tiny dog. Mine isn't.
"It's like parking in a handicap spot!" No silly, my dog takes up my foot space, no one else's
"The airline is losing money!" My dog & I weigh less combined than plenty of people who pay the same fare. I've also offered to buy a seat for my dog and leave her in a large crate on the seat. Not an option.
"The guy next to you doesn't want a dog around!" See answer 1. Also, 90% of people are happy to be distracted from the horror of flying. Anyone who isn't can easily trade seats, since most people are happy to sit by the pup.
- scotth 7y ago> I think airlines are leaving money on the table and should just have a relatively expensive travel-certification obedience course and charge a boatload for it. I'd happily pay $500 per year to have my dog authorized to fly in the cabin without an ESA (which incidentally cost less than half that). Love this idea.
- lxmorj 7y agoI've toyed with the idea of drafting a fake press release with Southwest branding announcing a program like this and just hoping to catch the wave: fake news -> real excitement -> free PR -> real news Alas my design chops are shit and I'm a bit over-committed on projects as it is.
- gjs278 7y agoI would feed your dog a penny. look it up.
- matchbok 7y agoImagine being so selfish and incapable of doing normal human things, like sit in a chair for a few hours, that you are willing to put a whole plane full of people through a bunch of nonsense and potential danger.
- lxmorj 7y agoI'm genuinely curious if you read the comment or just 5 or 6 words. What exactly is the potential danger? The way the system is set up is very stupid. It does in fact allow untrained, large, dangerous, poop-on-the-plane dogs onto planes with an online BS certificate. That doesn't mean that anyone who uses an online cert is putting people at risk on getting eaten by a Rhodesian Ridgeback. It is in fact possible to just train your dog properly...