4 ms·

As interesting as this is, SystemD replacement seems to be the wrong term, as it doesn't seem to support SystemD service, target, etc. files. Maybe a better te

• dbtx 7y ago
  Right. Don't replace systemd, compete with it. Don't remind everyone that your competitor exists.
• teknopaul 7y ago
  To replace the functionality of something you dont have to read its ugly config files. :) E.g. nginx can be used as an apache replacement. If it read exiting config file typically you would call it a "drop in replacement".
  • chabad360 7y ago
    Considering how ubiquitous SystemD is, I think a drop in replacement might just be a better idea.