3 ms·
It was ineffective for the author of the article. That doesn't mean it's ineffective for everyone.
by defilade 16y ago
It was ineffective for the author of the article. That doesn't mean it's ineffective for everyone.
- duncanj 16y agoIt's not like he did an n=1 study. He just assumed it wasn't going to work for him. My impression of the article, given that it doesn't really bring up data beyond the total number of acetaminophen-related cases of liver toxicity, is that the author believes he should be able to buy the drugs separately, and is denied this opportunity by the government. After that, he says everything he can to support his beliefs, and pooh-poohs arguments against it. Oxycodone is a very good opioid and, if you aren't abusing it, it is affordable for most people, even if you don't have insurance (http://www.rxassist.org/Search/Prog_Details.cfm?program_Id=178&PD_Id=518&Drug_Id=1158&Company_Id=103&search_type=2&CFID=6401022&CFTOKEN=18279899 http://www.rxassist.org/Search/Prog_Details.cfm?program_Id=1...). But if you need it every day to support your habit, it's too expensive, so vicodin and its friends are the drugs of choice.