> Their claim is that there shouldn't be liberty restrictions placed on software, but what they really mean is there should be different liberty restrictions pl

> Their claim is that there shouldn't be liberty restrictions placed on software, but what they really mean is there should be different liberty restrictions placed on software, specifically the ones they happen to like more. Of course there are different takes on this issue, but you make it sound as thought the GPL is a conspiracy by Stallman. The FOSS ecosystem encompasses a wide array of types of and takes on "freedom" and there is a place for all the different licenses developers can choose from to open source their code.