2 ms·
Many of the common web log analyzers are a bit long in the tooth. I've have used GoAccess for a while now and is mostly happy with it. It's fast enough and can
by xorcist 7y ago
Many of the common web log analyzers are a bit long in the tooth.
I've have used GoAccess for a while now and is mostly happy with it. It's fast enough and can generate pretty good looking static html which is mostly what you want for those simple use cases.
A side effect of processing log files is that you can freely try software on historical data.
- anderspitman 7y agoDo you have a recommendation on log format for GoAccess? I run a lot of custom services with no nginx etc in front, so I'll have to figure out the logging myself.
- joshyi 7y agoYou can always create an issue on their github page, lots of help in there: https://github.com/allinurl/goaccess/issues https://github.com/allinurl/goaccess/issues