3 ms·
To your last point, I'm not sure what you want to say: Nuclear accidents happen and the cleanup can't be that bad compared to electricity generated? Imagine we
by beders 7y ago
To your last point, I'm not sure what you want to say:
Nuclear accidents happen and the cleanup can't be that bad compared to electricity generated?
Imagine we would have used that $1b for renewables? Any idea how much power THAT would have generated?
It's interesting how the mind of nuclear power proponents work:
Unwilling to see the larger picture, denying of basic facts (like a failure rate of 1%, brilliant) or the enormous costs being handed to tax payers (on top of their electricity bill).
And down-voting facts they don't like.
- boomboomsubban 7y ago>To your last point, I'm not sure what you want to say: Nuclear accidents happen and the cleanup can't be that bad compared to electricity generated? No, mostly that blindly mentioning numbers is meaningless, particularly as a "hint" for how long cleanup took. >Unwilling to see the larger picture, denying of basic facts (like a failure rate of 1%, brilliant) or the enormous costs being handed to tax payers (on top of their electricity bill). There's no consensus on what the "big picture" is, there is a crisis right now and the best way to solve it may not be your ideal solution. I would need to be presented with basic facts to be able to deny them, random numbers or statistics with no context aren't facts. The government can pay enormous costs, I generally view that appeal as a scare tactic.