16 ms·
Because such a set would lack playability and have zero mass appeal (you would never buy this set stand alone). There was an Idea submission for such a set and
by lobotryas 7y ago
Because such a set would lack playability and have zero mass appeal (you would never buy this set stand alone). There was an Idea submission for such a set and it was rejected bu Lego:
https://ideas.lego.com/projects/a88109ec-9970-4fe1-98b4-9bd535856ab4/official_comments#content_nav_tabs https://ideas.lego.com/projects/a88109ec-9970-4fe1-98b4-9bd5...
- monocasa 7y agoThe ISS model specifically says it's for adults, 16+, so playability isn't a huge deal. Additionally IMO they're missing the boat by sticking to their classic distribution model that has the restraints you say. I mean sure, some sets aren't fit for shelf space in a Target toy aisle, but they should be able to JIT packaging for just about any set that's had the work put in as long as they don't run afoul of trademark.
- em-bee 7y agoi hope someone will build a thingiverse like site where you can upload any model design and order the necessary bricks to build it. there won't be a trademark issue for the brick producer, as they are only delivering an assortment of bricks. the model design comes from elsewhere. trademark may be enforced against uploaders of protected designs, but that is no problem as the design can still be shared elsewhere and it can't outright prevent anyone from ordering a certain assortment of bricks.