3 ms·
"linked to" is a weasel phrase. It means nothing. How big is the effect size? How robust is the evidence? What's the dose-response curve?
by quotemstr 7y ago
"linked to" is a weasel phrase. It means nothing. How big is the effect size? How robust is the evidence? What's the dose-response curve?
- MichaelApproved 7y agoIf you're really curious, these answers can be found by Googling.
- quotemstr 7y agoThe burden of proof rests on the party making the positive claim.
- MeltySmelty 7y agonot with leftists
- dsfyu404ed 7y agoThe person your replying to proclaims in a comment earlier today that he has no problem using less than precise language in order to further his ideology. I don't think the nuances of the statement "linked to" are very high on his priority list. I really hate dredging up past comments/opinions (since it invites ad hominess dismissals of valid points) but felt it was warranted in this case since it is directly related to your comment question of source robustness.