2 ms·
I work with large knowledge bases daily and the choke points just aren't in the tools - it's the humans. People generally suck at writing - they often have very
by The_Colonel 7y ago
I work with large knowledge bases daily and the choke points just aren't in the tools - it's the humans. People generally suck at writing - they often have very incomplete/skewed information, write only from their own perspective and are not that heavily invested in having great knowledge base (as opposed to solving their own immediate problem).
True domain experts who understand things typically don't have the time (and/or skill) to write good documents.
Documents don't get updated or in better case there's a series of "patch" documents describing the changes but not the complete future state.
I don't see how these major issues can be fixed by technology.
This could be largely mitigated by organizational changes - hiring dedicated technical writers / "knowledge managers", but that's just a cost center for companies so it essentially never happens.
- fulafel 7y agoI suspect there are a lot of different user bases and we're not thinking about the same one. There are existing organisations and institutions where people want to find tools like these and are excited about the prospect, for example expert organisations where cooperation and single shraed information base in a project is very valuable and the users are good at writing & collaboration, used to real-time tools with fine grained tight knit collaboration like Google Docs / Slack. Techology can grease the wheels and provide multipliers for motivated users, sometimes very large multipliers, but of course not every person is suited for it.