3 ms·
> Thanks for ruining the Web, Google. So, they helped make the web a far easier place to look around on things for a few decades and one layout change and you
by mekster 7y ago
> Thanks for ruining the Web, Google.
So, they helped make the web a far easier place to look around on things for a few decades and one layout change and you call them that they ruined the web?
It's easy to be on the barking side.
- tomc1985 7y agoIt's likely a distaste at the culmination of a lot of anti-customer moves that Google has made over the last few years Barking side, indeed
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- jansan 7y agoGoogle gave us a lot, but that does not mean they should not be criticized. Without emotion I can say that using Google is far worse today than it was in the early 2000s. Besides delivering the results in a much more readable format, at that time we were able to search specifically in forums and there were a lot of advanced features like "linkto:" that are not supported anymore. The problem I see is that Google does not care about us Geeks anymore. They are 100% focused on consumers now, and that sucks a lot.
- goatinaboat 7y agoThey are 100% focused on consumers now, and that sucks a lot. Focused on exploiting consumers, that is. Consumers are the livestock in Google’s factory farm. They are actively hostile to end users now.
- mekster 7y agoCriticizing is fine, sure but calling them they ruined the web? A bit stretched?
- nikofeyn 7y agothat's a rather simplistic and faulty argument. there are plenty of things wrong with "lure and then abuse" scenarios, and it isn't really an argument at all to say "but look at all the good the lure phase did".
- charlesism 7y agoGoogle has done away with most of its original competitive advantages. Its biggest advantages now are its name recognition and its size. If Google had started off with paid search results and what-you-search-for-is-not-what-you-get we'd probably all still be using Altavista.