3 ms·
The superficial typographic level is the difference, I was mostly talking about first impressions. Though you probably shouldn't really allow your expression to
by ddragon 7y ago
The superficial typographic level is the difference, I was mostly talking about first impressions. Though you probably shouldn't really allow your expression to get to the point that it's hard to read in Julia (for example abusing broadcast to create overly complex one-liners). At this point you should probably break it in multiple variables and functions.
And as Julia gets more mature and popular, I wouldn't be surprised if more people notice the strength of it's ecosystem and start creating new language that targets it, just like Elixir and Erlang or all JVM machines (and something more than just reader macros like LispSyntax.jl, like having full editor support and exclusive features that makes it unique compared to Julia). A JuliaLisp could have an amazing interop with the main language, and serve as an alternative for those who prefer s-expr.