5 ms·
and except for simple formalities, Arxiv isn't reviewed, typeset or anything else, which a normal journal usually entails (and typesetting costs... hands up, wh
by fock 7y ago
and except for simple formalities, Arxiv isn't reviewed, typeset or anything else, which a normal journal usually entails (and typesetting costs... hands up, who is doing all the integral d-s in mathrm...). And yet people cite Arxiv often blindly...
- thanatropism 7y ago\renewcommand{\d}{\mathrm d}
- mkl 7y agoI prefer \newcommand{\intd}{\,\mathrm{d}} to separate it a little.
- majos 7y agoACM and IEEE don’t review either, that’s all coordinated and done by volunteers, at least for every conference or journal I’ve reviewed for. Typesetting also seems irrelevant, I read a lot of Arxiv papers and have never found typesetting bad enough to matter. There seem to be other things ACM/IEEE does like helping pay for conference stuff or somehow supporting student chapters. But the literal editorial role looks oversold.