3 ms·
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham%27s_number https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham%27s_number number may be larger?
by vinnyglennon 7y ago
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham%27s_number https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham%27s_number number may be larger?
- klank 7y agoFrom the link you provided: > As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers. While I can't argue the specific details, I'm not surprised. BB numbers are not computable. Grahams number is.