3 ms·

I see what you're saying but im not sure that's a problem - how many people are building CDNs in their garages that need to be certified? Also, everything I sa

I see what you're saying but im not sure that's a problem - how many people are building CDNs in their garages that need to be certified? Also, everything I say on HN reflects my own opinion and not any organization, which is what my profile states. I do not hide behind an anonymous username precisely for this reason. Poisoning the well by doxxing me doesn't change how the AMP standard works for CDNs either, and only serves to derail the conversation.

lol768 7y ago
>Everything I say on HN reflects my own opinion and not any organizations, which is what my profile states Sorry, but I agree with dessant. Your profile doesn't disclose your affiliation and nor do your comments. It's absolutely relevant to the discussion, because whether you want to admit it or not (or try your best to act neutral), your day job will have some influence over your opinions on these sort of projects. You're right that it doesn't change objective facts about the specification, but I think it's misleading to suggest that, in general, external third-party CDNs are first class citizens in the AMP ecosystem when they're not treated the same within search.