3 ms·
You would probably need the kernel / filesystem to keep track of it to keep it efficient. And even then that is iffy if you implement it as a kernel extension
by novok 7y ago
You would probably need the kernel / filesystem to keep track of it to keep it efficient. And even then that is iffy if you implement it as a kernel extension vs. something integrated into filesystem code.
I've found arq backup overall slow once you start hitting 0.5TB overall. It's a design issue.
- kalleboo 7y ago> You would probably need the kernel / filesystem to keep track of it to keep it efficient I believe most operating systems have a mechanism for this. E.g. on macOS it's called fsevents, Linux has inotify
- 72deluxe 7y agoYes, these utilities would probably need something in them such that fswatch implements (https://emcrisostomo.github.io/fswatch/ https://emcrisostomo.github.io/fswatch/) - very useful.