3 ms·
>might not necessarily have any capitalistic value attached to it. You seem to use goals and "capitalistic value" interchangeably, I would just like to add tha
by pingyong 7y ago
>might not necessarily have any capitalistic value attached to it.
You seem to use goals and "capitalistic value" interchangeably, I would just like to add that projects in people's portfolios are often not initially created to make money, but simply to satisfy the creator's curiosity or because they thought it would be neat.
- itsmefaz 7y ago> I would just like to add that projects in people's portfolios are often not initially created to make money We both can agree on this. But that's not how Emil looks at it, his entire point is that projects are better credentials than even degrees. And since projects have higher value in portfolios, they will implicitly derive capital? One of the reasons why they have capitalistic value. You and I can both agree, that projects and learning do have fun elements attached to them and might not necessarily be part of a larger goal. However, that's not what his views are!
- pingyong 7y ago>However, that's not what his views are! I'm not sure how you got to that conclusion. Certainly I don't see how >projects are better credentials than even degrees. would necessarily conflict with >that projects and learning do have fun elements attached to them and might not necessarily be part of a larger goal.