3 ms·
Will you really be able to pull that off? I imagine certain parts of the code base you could use CI, but Rackspace servers cannot have downtime. If I were a Rac
by joshhart 16y ago
Will you really be able to pull that off? I imagine certain parts of the code base you could use CI, but Rackspace servers cannot have downtime. If I were a Rackspace customer, I wouldn't want innovation - I'd want my boxes to never go down. And I believe that means a rigorous QA process.
- AngryParsley 16y agoIt's not always true that development is a trade-off between fast feature development and stability. If you're building a monitoring system (like Cloudkick), more features means more stability for whatever you're monitoring.
- MartinCron 16y agoIt seems like you're creating a false dichotomy between rigorous QA and continuous deployment. If you have a working and stable production system and multiple layers of test automation, rigorous QA gets easier, in that they only have to validate one change at a time.