4 ms·
Original paper (Abstract): https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8948343 https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8948343 I don't have access to the full paper, but
by fernly 7y ago
Original paper (Abstract): https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8948343 https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8948343
I don't have access to the full paper, but I note this sentence of the abstract: "Simulations show that the device consumes very little power, with 100 times lower switching energy per unit area than DRAM, but with similar operating speeds."
So perhaps no actual devices exist, only concept and simulations?
Edit: I am reading the original via sci-hub and yes, all conclusions are based on (quite elaborate) device models.
- vermilingua 7y agoIs this not typically (read: always) the case with new technologies though? Before any production or engineering could be done, a model must be created. The fact that a model exists strongly implies that it is physically possible.
- scottlocklin 7y agoNo, as a matter of fact it's extremely rare a model precedes something physical that makes it to the corporeal world. Especially in device physics land.
- icandoit 7y agoMy pcbs existed in design software before they were manufactured. I expect that is the more common case today. I ran my code against a dev database before it went to prod.
- akiselev 7y agoThe GP isn't talking about products but about exploitation of physical phenomena. The first PCB was etched with the ancestor of our modern fab process long before CAD software. Although the hydrogen theory for acid and bases was discovered a few decades before, AFAIK there still isn't a unified model of acid-metal interactions for different copper alloys, let alone all metals.
- OisinMoran 7y agoSci-Hubify bookmarklet for super quick access: https://bookmarkify.it/9864 https://bookmarkify.it/9864
- IanCal 7y agoJust as a note, you don't need sci-hub for this, the link above has the full-text in because it's open access.