3 ms·

Agree. Not sure why they include paywall content. What % of user base is subbed to WaPo.

• kick 7y ago
  It's trivial to avoid the Washington Post's paywall, so there's no point in banning it. Obviously, a substantial amount of people could read it, because it's on the front page. A lot of sites also give exceptions to HN so we all can pass their paywalls, which is great. (Like FT, for example.)
  • hu3 7y ago
    I'd wager that a considerable portion upvotes for the title and comments alone.