For most people, avoiding thousands of papercuts is better than scaling massively. Few people need massive scale, but everyone hates papercuts. I'm also not ce

For most people, avoiding thousands of papercuts is better than scaling massively. Few people need massive scale, but everyone hates papercuts. I'm also not certain that the "fundamental design issues" with git are truly fundamental to its design. For example, partial clones and sparse checkouts are seeing increasing support in recent versions of git — and those are really all you need.