Uhm... I don't follow. Sounds like a lot of yada yada yada... corporations are evil... yada yada... Google is evil... yada yada... Mozilla is evil... yada yada

Uhm... I don't follow. Sounds like a lot of yada yada yada... corporations are evil... yada yada... Google is evil... yada yada... Mozilla is evil... yada yada... ChromeOS... And on and on. And it seems that when corporations take BSD and build their own distro that's cool - somehow, because BSD is "developed by open source enthusiasts", but when the same happens with Linux it is somehow hijacked. Similarly when corporations contribute to BSD that somehow leads to different results compared to contributing to Linux. Perhaps the author hasn't heard of Debian? And then the pointless detour into Mozilla's Firefox. Perhaps BSD has a magic browser that's not Firefox (or Chrome, though I am not at all a fan of Chrome)? For the record I have used both BSD (FreeBSD specifically) and Linux (many distributions over the years, currently I like Fedora). Both have their advantages and disadvantages. I do agree with some of the Author's points, actually, but that article is just sensationalist and loses a lot of weight because of that.