4 ms·
Oh, it's worse. End-to-end encryption assurances are essentially in conflict with centralized control over software development and distribution. Literally the
by zzzcpan 7y ago
Oh, it's worse. End-to-end encryption assurances are essentially in conflict with centralized control over software development and distribution. Literally the same organization end-to-end encryption is supposed to protect from is the one responsible for implementing and deploying that protection and doing that well and correctly.
- fdeage 7y agoThat's interesting. Could you develop on this conflict? For some reason it reminds me of the famous Moxie article: https://signal.org/blog/the-ecosystem-is-moving https://signal.org/blog/the-ecosystem-is-moving Is it the same idea?
- zzzcpan 7y agoIt's the opposite of Moxie's propaganda. Here's an example of this conflict at play: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22106536 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22106536