4 ms·
Folks tolerate many of the features you describe (lane-keep assist, emergency auto braking (edit - spelling)) because they make one of the most dangerous activ
by rhombocombus 7y ago
Folks tolerate many of the features you describe (lane-keep assist, emergency auto braking (edit - spelling)) because they make one of the most dangerous activities we participate in as a society objectively safer. Engine auto stop helps reduce emissions.
I get that you are putting a "pure" driving experience on a pedestal and from an aesthetic standpoint I tend to agree, but it sounds like you haven't had to mop up after a catastrophic collision. Tens of thousands of people die every year (edit- in highway collisions) and you are complaining about technologies designed with the express intent to mitigate that, so how do I look at your gripe as anything but selfish nostalgia?
- bob1029 7y agoWhy do we need a feature to steer for the driver or press their brakes? What is the new acceptable % of driver involvement in the activity? Is it now 95%? I don't understand why everyone seems to be OK with this grey area of man/machine responsibility. I've heard far more stories of lane keep assist doing something unexpected and causing panic than I have of it saving someone's ass.