5 ms·

Amateur has no negative connotations to me (as a native English speaker from the Midwest US). It's comparable to "hobbyist" or "enthusiast", basically meaning "

Amateur has no negative connotations to me (as a native English speaker from the Midwest US). It's comparable to "hobbyist" or "enthusiast", basically meaning "someone who can do X but doesn't get paid for it". I think a lot of people would be proud to be amateur musicians or amateur athletes, for example, and would have said that no (non-professional) customer would not want to be called an amateur. Just shows you have to be careful! And the pricing page (https://m3u-editor.com/#pricing https://m3u-editor.com/#pricing) looks pretty good to me - nice horizontal feature matrix, easy to locate buttons...not sure OP wants to use dark patterns like de-emphasizing the free tier. I do agree that the top plan should probably be more than $5/mo.

JshWright 7y ago
Agreed, "amateur" has pretty positive connotations for me in this context (native English speaker from New York).
- herohamp 7y ago
  As a native english speaker from Maryland while it doesnt have any negative connotations, I do feel a word like hobbyist would be better
  - emesis31 7y ago
    "Hobbyist" doesn't really make sense, as it's not my hobby to make MP3 playlists. "Amateur" is good as an antonym to "Pro".
    - atomize 7y ago
      I agree with Amateur as well. The Olympics (until the 90s [think USA Dream Team]) were only open to AMATEUR athletes. No one would argue that Olympians weren't skilled, and Olympians never felt slighted by this category. It simply implied that athletes trained and participated in a sport out of love for the game rather than for profit. Amateur literally describes: 'pursuing an activity independently of their source of income', that's all.
      - crtlaltdel 7y ago
        one could a/b test the plan label and put some teeth behind the many useful assertions in this thread, if one were so inclined
- jjeaff 7y ago
  But I don't think amateur works if you are being paid or are charging for something. Even if you are new. Amateur is fine for a hobbyist, but if you call an unexperienced "professional" an amateur, I think it would usually be considered a slight.
mmahemoff 7y ago
"Amateur" has some negative connotations (as another native speaker). It's often used an inferior comparison to "professional". Just search "amateur hour" to yield a stream of disparanging comments. https://twitter.com/search?q=amateur%20hour&src=typed_query https://twitter.com/search?q=amateur%20hour&src=typed_query I would definitely use "enthusiast" over "amateur" (or other variants, e.g. fan, fanatic, lover, or a label that's specific to in-group members of the genre, if one exists). I'd also suggest a-b testing all the things to end the speculation.
- smolder 7y ago
  It's contextual. Amateurs shouldn't be doing professional level work.

JshWright 7y ago

Agreed, "amateur" has pretty positive connotations for me in this context (native English speaker from New York).

herohamp 7y ago
As a native english speaker from Maryland while it doesnt have any negative connotations, I do feel a word like hobbyist would be better
- emesis31 7y ago
  "Hobbyist" doesn't really make sense, as it's not my hobby to make MP3 playlists. "Amateur" is good as an antonym to "Pro".
  - atomize 7y ago
    I agree with Amateur as well. The Olympics (until the 90s [think USA Dream Team]) were only open to AMATEUR athletes. No one would argue that Olympians weren't skilled, and Olympians never felt slighted by this category. It simply implied that athletes trained and participated in a sport out of love for the game rather than for profit. Amateur literally describes: 'pursuing an activity independently of their source of income', that's all.
    - crtlaltdel 7y ago
      one could a/b test the plan label and put some teeth behind the many useful assertions in this thread, if one were so inclined
jjeaff 7y ago
But I don't think amateur works if you are being paid or are charging for something. Even if you are new. Amateur is fine for a hobbyist, but if you call an unexperienced "professional" an amateur, I think it would usually be considered a slight.

mmahemoff 7y ago

"Amateur" has some negative connotations (as another native speaker). It's often used an inferior comparison to "professional". Just search "amateur hour" to yield a stream of disparanging comments. https://twitter.com/search?q=amateur%20hour&src=typed_query https://twitter.com/search?q=amateur%20hour&src=typed_query I would definitely use "enthusiast" over "amateur" (or other variants, e.g. fan, fanatic, lover, or a label that's specific to in-group members of the genre, if one exists). I'd also suggest a-b testing all the things to end the speculation.

smolder 7y ago
It's contextual. Amateurs shouldn't be doing professional level work.