4 ms·
> Yes, but capturing meaning mathematically is somewhat an unsolved problem in both mathematics, linguistics and semiotics. I've been successful via my search
by graycat 7y ago
> Yes, but capturing meaning mathematically is somewhat an unsolved problem in both mathematics, linguistics and semiotics.
I've been successful via my search math. For your claim, as far as I know, you are correct, but actually that does not make my search engine and its math impossible.
> That will produce a set of techniques that are observed to increase the ranking.
Ranking? I can't resist, to borrow from one of the most famous scenes in all of movies: "Ranking? What ranking? We don't need no stink'n ranking".
Nowhere in my search engine is anything like a ranking.
- pjc50 7y agoSo, do you only ever display one single result? Or do you display multiple results? Because if you display multiple results, they will be in a textual order, whether that's top to bottom or left to right, and that is a ranking. People pay tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars to move their result from #2 to #1 in the list of Google results.
- graycat 7y ago> #2 to #1 in the list of Google results. My user interface is very different from Google's, so different there's no real issue of #1 or #2. Actually that #1 or #2, etc. is apparently such a big issue for Google, SEO, etc. that it suggests a weakness in Google, one that my work avoids. You will see when you play a few minutes with my site after I announce the alpha test. Google often works well; when Google works well, my site is not better. But the post I responded to mentions some ways Google doesn't work well, and for those and some others my site stands to work much better. I'm not really in direct competition with Google.