4 ms·
By look rather bad, I think they mean the next lawsuit you bring against Uber would be their malicious handling of your account. Now a typical business can pro
by true_religion 7y ago
By look rather bad, I think they mean the next lawsuit you bring against Uber would be their malicious handling of your account.
Now a typical business can probably stop doing business with you simply because they hate you (not your 'kind', just you personally), but can Uber?
They are likely embershed in so many regulatory frameworks that require them to serve the general public fairly, that they won't be able to cut off service simply because you won a lawsuit against them.
- close04 7y ago>a typical business can probably stop doing business with you I think any private company doesn't have the legal obligation to serve you or many of the rules that apply to public/government institutions. See Cloudflare refusing to serve right-wing extremist websites, or Youtube taking down similar videos and channels. The only justification they need is that you failed to comply with the terms and conditions of the service. The leverage some have is judging them in the court of public opinion.
- sudosysgen 7y agoIt's different when its done as retaliation for a lawsuit. The courts look less than favourably upon that, in general.
- close04 7y agoOnly if you can prove it. And I have to wonder if clauses that force binding arbitration are considered illegal. Plenty of big companies use(d) them even on their own employees.