3 ms·
That would be a weird assumption, they look normal to me. You're not exactly an Occam's Razor type?
by robbrown451 7y ago
That would be a weird assumption, they look normal to me.
You're not exactly an Occam's Razor type?
- recursive 7y agoWeird? It's pretty standard. Are you familiar with default styling rules? https://codepen.io/recursive/pen/GRgwNdb https://codepen.io/recursive/pen/GRgwNdb
- robbrown451 7y agoI'm familiar with them, sure. But to assume something like this is broken rather than simply a color choice would, to me, be a strange and usually wrong assumption. Given that we've all (well, most of us) been on the web for 20-some years now, and noticed that web designers, for better or worse, often stray from defaults and choose different colors. More often than they put a form field with all the fields disabled. I'd certainly try typing into it before I emailed customer support. Incidently, on that codepen, the background colors of the disabled and non-disabled elements are identical, to my eyes. The only difference is in the border color. (and the behavior when clicked on)
- recursive 7y agoWeird. It looks like this to me on Firefox. (and everything else) https://imgur.com/a/qCn0fiH https://imgur.com/a/qCn0fiH
- robbrown451 7y agoYeah, both white backgrounds in chrome.
- recursive 7y agoFWIW, on my uncustomized chrome, I'm seeing the same style as FF. If I recall correctly, these have been the default styles in every browser I've seen since Netscape Navigator. Not sure about Safari.