3 ms·
einstein-god relationship has been proven false repeatedly. it has stuck around because people keep mass-forwarding stuff like that.. "It was, of course, a lie
by stopmi 16y ago
einstein-god relationship has been proven false repeatedly. it has stuck around because people keep mass-forwarding stuff like that..
"It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly." from http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0691023689?ie=UTF8&tag=savedbygracemini&link_code=as3&camp=211189&creative=373489&creativeASIN=0691023689 http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0691023689?ie=UTF8&tag=...
and a letter in which he wrote about his disbelief was auctioned a couple of years back: http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2008/may/12/peopleinscience.religion http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2008/may/12/peopleinscienc...
i said "_could_ result in confirmation bias". that is, make confirmation bias more probable, not absolute..
""Why was the universe created?"
Do you think science will ever answer this question?"
hopefully, some day, if we work towards it..
should we instead give up and resign ourselves to the fact that a wizard did it?
- pak 16y agoI didn't say he believed in a personal god. He believed in a more abstract sort of god, one that reflected the mysteries that humans will never penetrate; he also said this concept defined his sense of being religious. "A knowledge of the existence of something we cannot penetrate, of the manifestations of the profoundest reason and the most radiant beauty - it is this knowledge and this emotion that constitute the truly religious attitude; in this sense, and in this alone, I am a deeply religious man." "I believe in Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the orderly harmony of what exists, not in a God who concerns himself with the fates and actions of human beings."
- stopmi 16y agosource please? that was in response to a rabbi.. was he trying to be diplomatic? so he was.. agnostic? "My position concerning God is that of an agnostic. I am convinced that a vivid consciousness of the primary importance of moral principles for the betterment and ennoblement of life does not need the idea of a law-giver, especially a law-giver who works on the basis of reward and punishment." from: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/7921.html http://press.princeton.edu/titles/7921.html are agnostics believers? you are still assuming einstein is infallible. einstein believing in god would not really prove the existence of god he also did not believe in black-holes etc. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein#Einstein.27s_controversial_beliefs_in_physics http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein#Einstein.27s_controver...